This story appears in our Spring 2026 issue, on newsstands now. Want us to come to your place? Order the issue here to get it delivered to your door, or become a member to get digital access to the issue and early access to paywalled content.

Isabella stares down the barrel of a ludicrously girthy penis. Glossy blonde hair falls onto her enviably accented cheekbones, as her eyes roll back. Within a few seconds, the phallic cannon shoots out a money shot of excess liquidity, plastered over my laptop screen.

The scene looks almost real. But it’s entirely synthetic.

Isabella is an officially licensed virtual clone of Angelique Rose, a 23-year-old Spanish adult performer. She features on a new porn platform called SinfulX AI (not to be confused with SinfulX the sex toy brand). For two VIZ, roughly 30 cents, she has just responded to a “POV cumshot” prompt. Rose’s replicant was created by capturing a range of her expressions in a real-life shoot and then feeding it through an AI app. For SinfulX AI founder Nick, an adult industry veteran who prefers to stay semi-anonymous, it’s a logical progression for porn following the OnlyFans boom: “It’s another medium that will achieve greater control and probably less frustration.”

And it’s also a chance to get in on the AI porn gold rush. After OnlyFans pioneered custom content, the triple-X world is now getting tangled up with chatbots and virtual avatars. For years, we’ve been warned that the robots are coming for us. Now they’re asking us to come for them. And human performers are having to play catch-up.

With AI, like any new tech development, things quickly got pornographic. Generative AI first became widely available in the early 2020s. Following the rise of text-to-image services like Stable Diffusion, horny developers began to type their desires into existence. While many platforms blocked NSFW prompts, unfiltered generators like Nastia have since emerged, creating a Wild West of AI Reverse Cowgirls. Many denizens of this kind of content now congregate in the subreddit r/AIpornhub (which boasts 450,000 members).

In the more repulsive cesspits of the online world, apps and sites like MrDeep­ Fakes (which shut down in May 2025) made it possible to “nudify” real women without their consent. Even mainstream AIs like Grok, developed by Elon Musk, have been censured for generating “undressed” images. Regardless, other mainstream AI assistants are now going NSFW: Open­ AI is set to offer an adult mode for Chat­ GPT to enable mature conversations later this year.

Elsewhere, more dedicated and legitimate AI porn sites have launched, like Candy.AI, Spicy­ Chat, and Joi.AI, offering a roster of customizable virtual glamour models and cartoon characters to chat with. On Candy.AI, for example, users can slide into the DMs of the likes of Dark­ angel666 (a 23-year-old “unhinged” goth), Nia (a “captivating” 26-year-old jazz singer), or Lucy (a pregnant 21-year-old anime character)—or create their own AI companion. A premium subscription gives you tokens to spend on generating NSFW images and starting sexy voice calls.

Nick thinks they’re too girlfriend-experience orientated, but he shares their desire to realize people’s wildest wet dreams: “Our tagline is ‘Turn your fantasies into AI realities.’ ” This is the sell for AI erotica. Rule 34, a maxim that everything imaginable has been portrayed in porn, has now been taken to its logical extremes. Soon, if you want to instantly generate a giantess getting it on with a video game character, you probably can. “The possibilities are endless. People can express themselves. They can find their kinks for things that will never exist,” Nick says.

The industry is now faced with a gigantic conundrum: How to respond? The natural instinct is to rally against it. “When I hear ‘AI and porn,’ my mind goes straight to slop. … Sexual content is becoming more synthetic, lazy, overproduced, and bland,” says ethical porn pioneer Erika Lust. “Porn is already an ecosystem flooded with ugly, repetitive material: the same angles, the same scripts, the same bodies framed the same way. AI doesn’t magically fix that. It scales it.”

But where Lust fears the loss of the human touch, Vic Lagina, who was a lead producer and director for the porn production company Brazzers for 16 years and is the author of Filthy!: The Rise and (Pending) Death of Vic Lagina, welcomes it. “As a former business owner in porn, the prospect of completely eliminating humans from the equation in porn production would be extremely enticing,” he wrote in an email to Playboy, celebrating an end to “self-serving attitudes of performers, … questions about revoked consent despite whatever rigid protocols are in place, … bad hygiene, … and waiting for wood from a shaky male performer” before concluding: “It sounds like a dream.”

Perhaps that’s why many major adult entertainment brands are already trying to capture and repurpose performers’ likenesses for future use. Rachel Steele, an AVN MILF of the Year nominee, remembers getting a 19-page contract from a mainstream production company. It stated, she says, that they could voice-clone and own her likeness for “perpetuity” in any “universe” without compensation. “Like, if I decide to move to Mars,” she asks incredulously, “they still own my twin?”

That might explain why some fictional AI models are Frankensteinian amalgamations of real performers. (Nick says SinfulX’s original virtual avatars are based on a catalogue of licensed images of IRL porn stars, which are blended together to create new avatars that are entirely original.)

It’s why some adult content creators, like Rose, are actively and officially licensing their image to ensure they get paid fairly. Chloe Amour, a legendary 34-year-old porn star who re-entered the adult industry in 2024 after a five-year hiatus, has partnered with Joi.AI alongside fictional models (like “romantic posh rebel” Delaney) to develop a chatbot modeled on her real self that can send raunchy nudes based on what users request in the conversations. She wants it to fulfill her fans’ wishes. “You’re spending your hard-earned money on something, and you want to be satisfied by the product. And I am a person, but I am also a product—sometimes,” she says.

For porn stars like Amour, who already boast an existing dedicated fan base, creating a digital twin could be a lucrative source of income. “It’s a way of printing money while they sleep,” Nick says. Amour says it frees up time, and time is money. She’s so busy with juggling shoots, socials, and the rest of it, she says, she needs a second Chloe Amour. Now she has just that. But it doesn’t just mean she saves time—she can also withstand time. Digital twins don’t “age out” like human adult performers. “I can go on forever,” says Amour, laughing. “I’ll look back and be like, ‘Oh, she’s still getting it like she used to!’”

Steele gets this temptation. “[My digital twin] could literally work for me while I’m, you know, with my toes in the sand and a beer in my hand somewhere,” she says. She remembers performers being courted at an XBIZ convention by an AI representative: “Everyone’s ego [was] stroked by [the idea of it], because who doesn’t want to see more of themselves?” But she’s actually concerned about lasting forever—she thinks some companies might resurrect performers’ likenesses, Tupac-hologram-style, long after they have left the industry. And there are already teething issues when it comes to the relationship between real performers and AI companies: Angelique Rose’s character used to be called Angelique and was ostensibly based on her, but it has since been anony­mized by request.

But why would fans of Amour or Steele, anyway, choose to watch a robot of them versus the real thing? Amour positions her virtual avatar as a quick fix to give them “immediate satisfaction” and to offer a more affordable, entry-level alternative to expensive customs. She also thinks it allows fans to reimagine her to their heart’s content; if all porn is fantasy, AI extends it further. They could, she says, generate her in a bridal dress for a wedding fantasy without her having to spend hours creating the scene. Nick, mean- while, thinks it might be a way for people to explore hardcore interests, knowing that it didn’t actually happen: “To watch a girl or guy being spanked could be a bit intimidating. But you can explore that fetish through AI in a softer way.”

It remains to be seen, though, whether these cash-splashing AI porn consumers will be trusted to keep it soft. What happens when they try to get the fake Chloe Amour to do things the real Chloe Amour doesn’t want to do? According to Joi.AI, there are restrictions in place to respect real performers’ virtual boundaries; the bot will not, for example, entertain being humiliated. But, as seen with Grok and the like, fans are already creating twisted scenarios out of the performers’ control, proliferating a violation of privacy.

“When sex becomes frictionless, it stops reflecting real intimacy and starts training people to expect control without responsibility,” Lust warns.

For now, on many dedicated platforms, the possible fantasies are relatively vanilla. SinfulX’s original soft launch allowed more custom prompts (such as the poetic “POV, cumshot, blonde, forest”), which does seem to be a game-changing feature. But Nick says they simplified it and made a limited range of buttons, as only about 20 percent of their “tech-savvy” user base were typing in anything imaginative. (Thinking with your penis, it turns out, is not a good idea.)

He emphasizes that SinfulX will still try to satisfy niche fetishes, now that it has loaded up 70 popular scenarios: “We have a category called ‘Monster Cock’ we’re rolling out on different models. People want to see a giant cock, right? Because it’s exciting and it’s unlikely you will see it in reality.” The platform, he says, is set to release new possibilities on a weekly basis.

Currently, though, the options on these legitimate AI porn platforms are, ironically, generic. “AI systems often reproduce the same narrow, biased ideas of beauty, race, gender, and desire, while pretending to be limitless,” Lust says. Plus, the UI is dodgy, the clips last mere seconds, and some pricing structures could be described as translucent at best.

Perhaps bringing an anime girlfriend to life makes most sense, but it’s hard to see why anyone would pay money to generate an AI model giving an AI dick a blow job, when they can watch a real model doing the same, in a far higher-quality video. Perhaps, the most fervent users actively get off on the AI element, sex robot–style. “People do find pleasure in the combination of technology and sex even when there are more ‘realistic’ options available, including human-to- human, off line interactions,” says Peter Alilunas, a professor of cinema studies at University of Oregon in Eugene and a member of the editorial board of the academic journal Porn Studies.

For others, though, these limitations render these platforms useless. But it’s probably not a smart idea to insult the intelligence of these platforms; like all AI, it’s only going to get bigger, better, and unsloppier. If AI imagery soon becomes indiscernible from the real thing, that will be applied to porn too. Lagina’s closing words are dystopian: “My advice to organic performers who don’t have skills or a plan outside of porn: save your money and up your game as your fans are fickle and will gravitate towards the digital version of you for a better experience.”

Lust is more hopeful that humans will fight back against the slop onslaught: “I think we’re going to see a split become sharper. One path is mass, automated porn—fast, disposable, impersonal—where human labor and performer rights are treated as obstacles to efficiency. The other path, which I believe will grow, is responsible desire: consumers who actively want real humans, real connection, real intimacy, real images—and who start to value transparency as part of arousal.”

For now, we’re in an in-between moment. The future of AI porn isn’t bright or dim yet—but it’s already in motion. “It will be sloppier, cleaner, uncannier, bigger, smaller, hyper­ realistic, completely artificial, indistinguishable from reality, and everything in between—it will be all those things, because there will be many systems that make it,” Alilunas says. Where some people in the adult industry will see red flags, others will see dollar signs. All at the thought of customers’ eyes fixed on bogus monster penises, as they feed the virtual beast with more real cash.